Search for: All records

IntroductionQuantum computing is increasingly being investigated for integration into medical radiology and healthcare applications worldwide. Given its potential to enhance clinical care and medical research, there is growing interest in evaluating its practical applications in clinical workflows. MethodsWe developed an evaluation of quantum computing-based auto-contouring methods to introduce medical physicists to this emerging technology. We implemented existing quantum algorithms as prototypes tailored for specific quantum hardware, focusing on their application to auto-contouring in medical imaging. The evaluation was performed using a medical resonance imaging (MRI) abdominal dataset, comprising 102 patient scans. ResultsThe quantum algorithms were applied to the dataset and assessed for their potential in auto-contouring tasks. One of the quantum-based auto contouring methods demonstrated conceptual feasibility, practical performance is still limited by current available quantum hardware and scalability constraints. DiscussionOur findings suggest that while quantum computing for auto-contouring shows promise, it remains in its early stages. At present, artificial intelligence-based algorithms continue to be the preferred choice for auto-contouring in treatment planning due to their greater efficiency and accuracy. As quantum hardware and algorithms mature, their integration into clinical workflows may become more viable. 

Abstract Image segmentation of the liver is an important step in treatment planning for liver cancer. However, manual segmentation at a large scale is not practical, leading to increasing reliance on deep learning models to automatically segment the liver. This manuscript develops a generalizable deep learning model to segment the liver on T1-weighted MR images. In particular, three distinct deep learning architectures (nnUNet, PocketNet, Swin UNETR) were considered using data gathered from six geographically different institutions. A total of 819 T1-weighted MR images were gathered from both public and internal sources. Our experiments compared each architecture’s testing performance when trained both intra-institutionally and inter-institutionally. Models trained using nnUNet and its PocketNet variant achieved mean Dice-Sorensen similarity coefficients>0.9 on both intra- and inter-institutional test set data. The performance of these models suggests that nnUNet and PocketNet liver segmentation models trained on a large and diverse collection of T1-weighted MR images would on average achieve good intra-institutional segmentation performance. 

Accurate medical imaging segmentation is critical for precise and effective medi- cal interventions. However, despite the success of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical image segmentation, they still face challenges in handling fine-scale features and variations in image scales. These challenges are particularly evident in complex and challenging segmentation tasks, such as the BraTS multi- label brain tumor segmentation challenge. In this task, accurately segmenting the various tumor sub-components, which vary significantly in size and shape, remains a significant challenge, with even state-of-the-art methods producing substantial errors. Therefore, we propose two architectures, FMG-Net and W-Net, that incor- porate the principles of geometric multigrid methods for solving linear systems of equations into CNNs to address these challenges. Our experiments on the BraTS 2020 dataset demonstrate that both FMG-Net and W-Net outperform the widely used U-Net architecture regarding tumor subcomponent segmentation accuracy and training efficiency. These findings highlight the potential of incorporating the principles of multigrid methods into CNNs to improve the accuracy and efficiency of medical imaging segmentation. 

Abstract BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are known to suffer from a variety of acquisition artifacts as well as equipment‐based variations that impact image appearance and segmentation performance. It is still unclear whether a direct relationship exists between magnetic resonance (MR) image quality metrics (IQMs) (e.g., signal‐to‐noise, contrast‐to‐noise) and segmentation accuracy. PurposeDeep learning (DL) approaches have shown significant promise for automated segmentation of brain tumors on MRI but depend on the quality of input training images. We sought to evaluate the relationship between IQMs of input training images and DL‐based brain tumor segmentation accuracy toward developing more generalizable models for multi‐institutional data. MethodsWe trained a 3D DenseNet model on the BraTS 2020 cohorts for segmentation of tumor subregions enhancing tumor (ET), peritumoral edematous, and necrotic and non‐ET on MRI; with performance quantified via a 5‐fold cross‐validated Dice coefficient. MRI scans were evaluated through the open‐source quality control tool MRQy, to yield 13 IQMs per scan. The Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between whole tumor (WT) dice values and IQM measures in the training cohorts to identify quality measures most correlated with segmentation performance. Each selected IQM was used to group MRI scans as “better” quality (BQ) or “worse” quality (WQ), via relative thresholding. Segmentation performance was re‐evaluated for the DenseNet model when (i) training on BQ MRI images with validation on WQ images, as well as (ii) training on WQ images, and validation on BQ images. Trends were further validated on independent test sets derived from the BraTS 2021 training cohorts. ResultsFor this study, multimodal MRI scans from the BraTS 2020 training cohorts were used to train the segmentation model and validated on independent test sets derived from the BraTS 2021 cohort. Among the selected IQMs, models trained on BQ images based on inhomogeneity measurements (coefficient of variance, coefficient of joint variation, coefficient of variation of the foreground patch) and the models trained on WQ images based on noise measurement peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) yielded significantly improved tumor segmentation accuracy compared to their inverse models. ConclusionsOur results suggest that a significant correlation may exist between specific MR IQMs and DenseNet‐based brain tumor segmentation performance. The selection of MRI scans for model training based on IQMs may yield more accurate and generalizable models in unseen validation.